Stocks And Diversification
Any investor who has done some research is well aware of the advice diversify your investment portfolio to minimize your risk. It makes sense; we as cautious humans quickly understand the old proverb "Don't put all your eggs in one basket". But when it comes down to the dollars and cents, does investor diversification benefit the smaller investor?
Where we are at any point in our investment life cycle will have a huge bearing on our tolerance for risk. Some people are naturally risky, others much more cautious. For those starting out in their working careers the money they invest is very limited and they don't want to lose any of it. For those in the wealth accumulation years they tend to be much more risk tolerant. For them there is a bigger base so a small loss isn't as important and they have years to recoup any losses. For those at the end of their working lives or in retirement, the risk profile is probably much lower. All these factors mean that as individuals, our attitude to diversification will be different.
Diversification has an inherent flaw. If you are minimizing your risk, you may at the same time be minimizing your gains also. If we only invest in one stock we miss out on the opportunity to invest in three other stock picks which are having stellar returns.
For the smaller investor the amount they have to invest will determine the level of diversification they can achieve. We are told to have a number of different stocks, fixed investments, property etc. But to buy all these might end up with the investor having thimble sized investments in a number of areas, which just isn't sensible.
There are commentators out there who use the examples "Henry Ford didn't diversify, neither did Bill Gates". But in the end these are two successful examples. For all the successes there are countless failures where investors have been wiped out by over reliance in one area.
In the end, just as we are individuals, our investment diversification decisions must be tailored to our circumstances. - 23200
Where we are at any point in our investment life cycle will have a huge bearing on our tolerance for risk. Some people are naturally risky, others much more cautious. For those starting out in their working careers the money they invest is very limited and they don't want to lose any of it. For those in the wealth accumulation years they tend to be much more risk tolerant. For them there is a bigger base so a small loss isn't as important and they have years to recoup any losses. For those at the end of their working lives or in retirement, the risk profile is probably much lower. All these factors mean that as individuals, our attitude to diversification will be different.
Diversification has an inherent flaw. If you are minimizing your risk, you may at the same time be minimizing your gains also. If we only invest in one stock we miss out on the opportunity to invest in three other stock picks which are having stellar returns.
For the smaller investor the amount they have to invest will determine the level of diversification they can achieve. We are told to have a number of different stocks, fixed investments, property etc. But to buy all these might end up with the investor having thimble sized investments in a number of areas, which just isn't sensible.
There are commentators out there who use the examples "Henry Ford didn't diversify, neither did Bill Gates". But in the end these are two successful examples. For all the successes there are countless failures where investors have been wiped out by over reliance in one area.
In the end, just as we are individuals, our investment diversification decisions must be tailored to our circumstances. - 23200
posted by X - Men @ 11:25 AM
0 Comments
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home